by Saqib Khan | Mar 13, 2025 | Conveyancing, General, Landlord and Tenant Law, Litigation, People
Purchasing a new-build home is often envisioned as a seamless transition into modern living. However, numerous homeowners across the UK have encountered significant challenges with unfinished estates, leading to frustration and legal concerns.
Common Issues Faced by Homeowners
Residents in various new-build developments have reported a range of issues, including:
• Unfinished Roads and Pavements: In Shrewsbury, homeowners on the Lilly Hay estate, developed by Taylor Wimpey, have been waiting up to five years for the completion of roads and pavements. The lack of proper infrastructure has resulted in uneven surfaces and potholes, posing safety risks and causing damage to vehicles.
• Non-functional Street lights: At Tadpole Garden Village in Swindon, residents have expressed frustration over non-functional street lights, contributing to safety concerns and an increase in local crime rates.
• Structural Defects: Some homeowners have discovered significant structural issues post-purchase, such as the absence of cavity-wall insulation, leading to increased energy costs and discomfort. Legal avenues, like the Defective Premises Act 1972, may offer recourse in such situations.
Legal Protections and Remedies
Homeowners facing these challenges have several legal protections and remedies available:
• Consumer Rights Act 2015: This act ensures that services provided, including construction work, must be performed with reasonable care and skill. If a developer fails to meet these standards, homeowners may be entitled to remedies such as repairs, replacements, or financial compensation.
• Defective Premises Act 1972: Under this act, homeowners can claim damages against developers for substandard work that results in defects, especially if building regulations have been breached. The Building Safety Act 2022 has extended the limitation period for such claims to 30 years, allowing homeowners more time to seek redress.
• New Homes Quality Code: This code mandates developers to provide clear and accurate information about the property. Failure to disclose significant details, such as the erection of large structures near homes, can lead to compensation claims, as seen in Newcastle where a couple was awarded £700 after a 40-foot fence was built outside their property without prior notice.
Steps for Homeowners
If you’re experiencing issues with your new-build property:
1. Document All Issues: Keep detailed records of defects, including photographs and correspondence with the developer.
2. Communicate with the Developer: Report problems promptly and allow the developer an opportunity to address them.
3. Seek Legal Advice: If issues remain unresolved, consult with one of our solicitors to understand your rights and potential legal actions.
4. Utilise Dispute Resolution Services: Engage with independent schemes or ombudsman services designed to handle disputes between homeowners and developers.
Conclusion
While new-build homes offer the promise of modern amenities and design, it’s crucial for homeowners to be vigilant and informed about their rights. Should issues arise, legal frameworks are in place to protect consumers and ensure that developers meet their obligations.
At Khan Mather Solicitors, we are committed to assisting homeowners in navigating these challenges and securing the homes they were promised.
by Saqib Khan | Feb 25, 2025 | Conveyancing, General, Litigation
In a victory for a wealthy couple, a recent legal battle over a £32.5 million London mansion has concluded with a ruling in their favour. The case centred around a significant moth infestation discovered shortly after the couple moved into the property. This high-profile case highlights the importance of thorough due diligence when purchasing high-value properties and raises questions about liability for pre-existing defects.
The couple, whose identities have not been publicly disclosed, claimed they were unaware of the extent of the moth infestation when they purchased the property. They argued that the infestation constituted a significant defect that rendered the property uninhabitable and significantly diminished its value. Their legal team presented evidence suggesting the infestation was present prior to the purchase, and that the previous owners had failed to adequately address the issue.
The sellers, on the other hand, reportedly argued that the couple had ample opportunity to inspect the property before the sale was finalised, and that the “buyer beware” principle applied. They also suggested that the infestation was not severe enough to warrant the claims made by the couple.
However, the judge ruled in favour of the couple, stating that the sellers had a legal obligation to disclose any known defects that could significantly impact the value or habitability of the property. The judge determined that the moth infestation, given its scale and potential to cause damage, fell under this category. The ruling emphasized the importance of transparency and honesty in property transactions, particularly at the high end of the market.
What does this mean for buyers of high-value properties?
This case serves as a crucial reminder for anyone considering purchasing a luxury property in the UK. While the “buyer beware” principle still holds some weight, sellers also have a responsibility to disclose known issues. Here are some key takeaways:
• Thorough Inspections are Essential: Don’t rely solely on estate agent descriptions. Commission independent surveys from reputable professionals, including specialists in pest control if there are any suspicions. For high-value properties, consider a more in-depth building survey.
• Due Diligence is Key: Investigate the property’s history. Ask specific questions about any past issues, including infestations, damp, or structural problems. Document everything.
• Legal Advice is Paramount: Before making an offer, consult with a solicitor specializing in property law. They can help you understand your rights and obligations, and ensure the contract protects your interests. A solicitor can also advise on the implications of any disclosures made by the seller.
• Consider Specialist Reports: For older or particularly valuable properties, consider obtaining specialist reports. These might include structural surveys, damp reports, or in this case, an entomologist’s report on insect infestations.
What does this mean for sellers of high-value properties?
Sellers also need to be aware of their obligations:
• Transparency is Crucial: Disclose any known defects, no matter how minor they may seem. It’s always better to be upfront and avoid potential legal issues later.
• Maintain Records: Keep detailed records of any work carried out on the property, including repairs, maintenance, and pest control treatments.
• Seek Legal Advice: Consult with a solicitor before putting your property on the market to understand your legal obligations regarding disclosure.
This case sets a precedent for future disputes involving high-value properties and underscores the importance of transparency and thoroughness in property transactions. If you are considering buying or selling a luxury property, it is essential to seek professional legal advice to ensure your interest.
If you wish to discuss any of the above, please contact Hannah on 0161 850 911.
by Allan Phillips | Oct 31, 2024 | Business, Conveyancing, General, Litigation
Following the UK Autumn Budget on 30 October 2024, significant changes to stamp duty have been introduced, impacting landlords, second-home buyers, and potentially reshaping the housing market.
Key Changes to Stamp Duty in the 2024 Budget
1.
Increase in Stamp Duty on Additional Properties
From 31 October 2024, the surcharge on stamp duty for purchasing additional properties (such as buy-to-let investments and second homes) increased by 2 percentage points, raising it to 5%. This change affects the overall stamp duty rates on additional property purchases across different price brackets. For example, homes valued between £250,001 and £925,000 now incur a total stamp duty of 10%, up from 8%. This move primarily targets property investors and second-home buyers to generate revenue while supporting homeownership among first-time buyers.
2.
Impact on First-Time Buyer Threshold
While the first-time buyer relief thresholds remain unchanged, the current stamp duty thresholds introduced under the previous government (no stamp duty on homes valued up to £250,000, or £425,000 for first-time buyers) are set to revert to their previous levels in March 2025. The Labour government has not committed to extending these higher thresholds, which could result in increased tax obligations for all buyers next year if the relief is not renewed.
3.
Revenue and Market Implications
The stamp duty increase on additional properties is expected to generate significant revenue, which the government aims to reinvest in affordable housing. The new policy may reduce competition for first-time buyers, especially in areas with high levels of investment in buy-to-let properties. However, the increased rates could potentially slow down investment in rental properties, impacting rental availability and affordability.
For prospective landlords and buyers of additional properties, understanding the updated tax implications is essential for financial planning. At Khan Mather, we can help navigate these changes and advise on optimal strategies for property investments.
For more details, please contact us directly to discuss how these changes may affect your property decisions.
by Saqib Khan | Oct 31, 2024 | Business, Conveyancing, General, Litigation
At KhanMather, we are committed to helping our clients navigate the complex landscape of financial regulations and compliance. Two terms that often come up in discussions about financial crime are “smurfing” and “structuring”. Understanding these concepts is crucial for businesses of all sizes to ensure they are not inadvertently facilitating illegal activities. In this blog, we will explain what smurfing and structuring are, how they work, and what steps you can take to protect your business.
What is Smurfing?
Smurfing is a money laundering technique that involves breaking down a large sum of money into smaller, less suspicious amounts. These smaller amounts are then deposited into various bank accounts or used to purchase financial instruments, making it difficult for authorities to trace the origin of the funds. The term “smurfing” comes from the analogy to the cartoon characters called Smurfs, who are small and numerous, just like the transactions in this technique.
How Smurfing Works
- Splitting Funds: A large amount of illicit money is divided into smaller sums.
- Multiple Transactions: These smaller amounts are deposited into multiple bank accounts or used to purchase money orders, traveler’s checks, or other negotiable instruments.
- Avoiding Detection: By keeping transactions below the reporting threshold, typically £10,000, the individual avoids triggering automatic reporting to authorities.
What is Structuring?
Structuring is essentially the same as smurfing but is often used in a broader context. While smurfing specifically refers to breaking down deposits, structuring encompasses various methods of breaking down and spreading out transactions to avoid detection.
How Structuring Works
- Deposit Structuring: Similar to smurfing, large deposits are broken into smaller amounts and spread across different accounts.
- Withdrawal Structuring: In some cases, the process is reversed, with large sums being withdrawn in smaller increments.
- Complex Transactions: Structuring can also involve moving money through a series of transactions that make it difficult to trace, such as using shell companies or offshore accounts.
Legal Implications and Penalties
Both smurfing and structuring are illegal under UK law. The Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA) and the Money Laundering Regulations 2017 set out strict requirements for reporting suspicious activities and maintaining robust anti-money laundering (AML) controls.
Penalties for Involvement
- Fines: Businesses found to be involved in smurfing or structuring can face significant financial penalties.
- Criminal Charges: Individuals may face criminal charges, leading to imprisonment.
- Reputational Damage: Even unintentional involvement in such activities can severely damage a business’s reputation.
Protecting Your Business
To safeguard your business against involvement in smurfing or structuring, it is essential to implement comprehensive AML policies and procedures. Here are some key steps:
- Know Your Customer (KYC): Establish robust KYC processes to verify the identity of your clients and understand their financial activities.
- Transaction Monitoring: Implement systems to monitor and flag unusual or suspicious transactions.
- Staff Training: Regularly train employees on AML regulations and how to recognize suspicious activity.
- Reporting: Ensure that any suspicious activity is reported to the National Crime Agency (NCA) promptly.
Conclusion
Smurfing and structuring pose significant risks to businesses, both legally and reputationally. At KhanMather, we understand the importance of maintaining compliance with financial regulations. Our team of experts is here to provide you with the guidance and support needed to protect your business from financial crime. If you have any concerns or need assistance with AML compliance, please do not hesitate to contact us.
For more information on financial crime prevention and compliance, visit our website or contact our team at KhanMather on 0161 850 9911. We are here to help you navigate the complexities of the legal landscape and safeguard your business.
by Saqib Khan | Sep 18, 2024 | Litigation, Personal injury
Introduction: In a recent landmark decision, the Supreme Court delivered a judgment with far-reaching implications for thousands of personal injury claims across the UK. The case of Hassam and another v Rabot and another [2024] UKSC 11 has provided clarity on the assessment of damages for pain, suffering, and loss of amenity (PSLA) in instances where both whiplash injuries (WLI) and non-whiplash injuries (NWI) are sustained in a road traffic accident.
Background: The Civil Liability Act 2018 introduced significant reforms to the compensation process for WLI caused by negligent driving. Under these reforms, the amount awarded for PSLA related to WLI was fixed at a tariff amount, which differs only based on the duration of the WLI and is notably lower than traditional common law damages.
In the cases of Mr. Rabot and Mr. Briggs, both claimants suffered from WLIs and NWIs in separate car accidents. The District Judge initially assessed damages for PSLA caused by both types of injuries, leading to appeals and cross-appeals regarding the appropriate method of calculating compensation.
Judgment: The Supreme Court unanimously dismissed the appeals and cross-appeals, affirming the approach adopted by the majority of the Court of Appeal. Lord Burrows, delivering the judgment, outlined the correct method for assessing damages for PSLA concurrently caused by WLIs and NWIs.
Reasoning: The Court rejected the “first approach,” which sought to limit PSLA damages to exclusively NWIs, as it would require unrealistic precision from claimants and could result in lower compensation for both types of injuries. Similarly, the “second approach,” which ignored overlapping PSLA, was deemed inadequate as it would lead to overcompensation.
Instead, the Court endorsed the “third approach,” which involves assessing the tariff amount for WLIs and common law damages for NWIs separately, adding them together, and making adjustments to avoid over- or under-compensation.
Conclusion: The decision in Hassam v Rabot provides clarity on the assessment of damages for PSLA in cases involving both WLIs and NWIs. By affirming the third approach, the Supreme Court has upheld the principles of fairness and consistency in compensation awards while respecting the legislative intent behind the Civil Liability Act 2018.
This judgment serves as a crucial guide for legal practitioners, claimants, and defendants navigating personal injury claims involving mixed injuries. It underscores the importance of a balanced approach to compensation that considers the unique circumstances of each case while ensuring fair redress for the injured parties.
by Saqib Khan | Sep 5, 2024 | General, Litigation
Introduction
In the realm of civil litigation, legal professional privilege stands as a cornerstone principle safeguarding the confidentiality of communications between solicitors and their clients. As a fundamental aspect of the legal landscape, understanding the nuances of this privilege is imperative for both legal practitioners and their clients. In this guide, we delve into the intricacies of legal professional privilege within the context of civil litigation, shedding light on its importance, scope, and exceptions.
Understanding Legal Professional Privilege: Legal professional privilege, embodies the confidentiality inherent in the relationship between a solicitor and their client. This privilege serves to protect communications exchanged between them from disclosure to third parties, including courts, tribunals, and opposing parties.
Types of Legal Professional Privilege:
- Legal Advice Privilege: This privilege extends to confidential communications between a client and their lawyer for the purpose of seeking or receiving legal advice. It covers not only advice given but also any documents created with the dominant purpose of seeking or providing legal advice.
- Litigation Privilege: Unlike legal advice privilege, litigation privilege comes into play when litigation is either ongoing or reasonably anticipated. It shields communications between a client, their lawyer, and third parties, provided they are made for the dominant purpose of preparing for or conducting litigation.
Exceptions and Limitations: While legal professional privilege is a fundamental aspect of the legal system, it is not absolute. There are exceptions and limitations that one must be aware of:
- Waiver: Privilege can be waived if the client voluntarily discloses the privileged information to third parties.
- Crime or Fraud Exception: Privilege may not apply if legal advice or assistance is sought for the purpose of committing a crime or fraud.
- Communications with Third Parties: Privilege generally does not extend to communications with third parties unless they are made in furtherance of obtaining legal advice or preparing for litigation.
Challenges and Practical Considerations: Navigating legal professional privilege in civil litigation can pose various challenges and require careful consideration. From determining the applicability of privilege to managing potential waivers and exceptions, legal practitioners must exercise diligence and expertise to uphold their clients’ confidentiality rights while effectively representing their interests in litigation.
Conclusion: Legal professional privilege serves as a cornerstone principle in civil litigation, safeguarding the confidentiality of communications between solicitors and their clients. Understanding its scope, exceptions, and practical implications is essential for both legal practitioners and their clients. By staying informed and navigating privilege with care, parties involved in civil litigation can uphold the integrity of the legal process while protecting their rights and interests.
