by Allan Phillips | Oct 31, 2024 | Business, Conveyancing, General, Litigation
Following the UK Autumn Budget on 30 October 2024, significant changes to stamp duty have been introduced, impacting landlords, second-home buyers, and potentially reshaping the housing market.
Key Changes to Stamp Duty in the 2024 Budget
1.
Increase in Stamp Duty on Additional Properties
From 31 October 2024, the surcharge on stamp duty for purchasing additional properties (such as buy-to-let investments and second homes) increased by 2 percentage points, raising it to 5%. This change affects the overall stamp duty rates on additional property purchases across different price brackets. For example, homes valued between £250,001 and £925,000 now incur a total stamp duty of 10%, up from 8%. This move primarily targets property investors and second-home buyers to generate revenue while supporting homeownership among first-time buyers.
2.
Impact on First-Time Buyer Threshold
While the first-time buyer relief thresholds remain unchanged, the current stamp duty thresholds introduced under the previous government (no stamp duty on homes valued up to £250,000, or £425,000 for first-time buyers) are set to revert to their previous levels in March 2025. The Labour government has not committed to extending these higher thresholds, which could result in increased tax obligations for all buyers next year if the relief is not renewed.
3.
Revenue and Market Implications
The stamp duty increase on additional properties is expected to generate significant revenue, which the government aims to reinvest in affordable housing. The new policy may reduce competition for first-time buyers, especially in areas with high levels of investment in buy-to-let properties. However, the increased rates could potentially slow down investment in rental properties, impacting rental availability and affordability.
For prospective landlords and buyers of additional properties, understanding the updated tax implications is essential for financial planning. At Khan Mather, we can help navigate these changes and advise on optimal strategies for property investments.
For more details, please contact us directly to discuss how these changes may affect your property decisions.
by Saqib Khan | Oct 31, 2024 | Business, Conveyancing, General, Litigation
At KhanMather, we are committed to helping our clients navigate the complex landscape of financial regulations and compliance. Two terms that often come up in discussions about financial crime are “smurfing” and “structuring”. Understanding these concepts is crucial for businesses of all sizes to ensure they are not inadvertently facilitating illegal activities. In this blog, we will explain what smurfing and structuring are, how they work, and what steps you can take to protect your business.
What is Smurfing?
Smurfing is a money laundering technique that involves breaking down a large sum of money into smaller, less suspicious amounts. These smaller amounts are then deposited into various bank accounts or used to purchase financial instruments, making it difficult for authorities to trace the origin of the funds. The term “smurfing” comes from the analogy to the cartoon characters called Smurfs, who are small and numerous, just like the transactions in this technique.
How Smurfing Works
- Splitting Funds: A large amount of illicit money is divided into smaller sums.
- Multiple Transactions: These smaller amounts are deposited into multiple bank accounts or used to purchase money orders, traveler’s checks, or other negotiable instruments.
- Avoiding Detection: By keeping transactions below the reporting threshold, typically £10,000, the individual avoids triggering automatic reporting to authorities.
What is Structuring?
Structuring is essentially the same as smurfing but is often used in a broader context. While smurfing specifically refers to breaking down deposits, structuring encompasses various methods of breaking down and spreading out transactions to avoid detection.
How Structuring Works
- Deposit Structuring: Similar to smurfing, large deposits are broken into smaller amounts and spread across different accounts.
- Withdrawal Structuring: In some cases, the process is reversed, with large sums being withdrawn in smaller increments.
- Complex Transactions: Structuring can also involve moving money through a series of transactions that make it difficult to trace, such as using shell companies or offshore accounts.
Legal Implications and Penalties
Both smurfing and structuring are illegal under UK law. The Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA) and the Money Laundering Regulations 2017 set out strict requirements for reporting suspicious activities and maintaining robust anti-money laundering (AML) controls.
Penalties for Involvement
- Fines: Businesses found to be involved in smurfing or structuring can face significant financial penalties.
- Criminal Charges: Individuals may face criminal charges, leading to imprisonment.
- Reputational Damage: Even unintentional involvement in such activities can severely damage a business’s reputation.
Protecting Your Business
To safeguard your business against involvement in smurfing or structuring, it is essential to implement comprehensive AML policies and procedures. Here are some key steps:
- Know Your Customer (KYC): Establish robust KYC processes to verify the identity of your clients and understand their financial activities.
- Transaction Monitoring: Implement systems to monitor and flag unusual or suspicious transactions.
- Staff Training: Regularly train employees on AML regulations and how to recognize suspicious activity.
- Reporting: Ensure that any suspicious activity is reported to the National Crime Agency (NCA) promptly.
Conclusion
Smurfing and structuring pose significant risks to businesses, both legally and reputationally. At KhanMather, we understand the importance of maintaining compliance with financial regulations. Our team of experts is here to provide you with the guidance and support needed to protect your business from financial crime. If you have any concerns or need assistance with AML compliance, please do not hesitate to contact us.
For more information on financial crime prevention and compliance, visit our website or contact our team at KhanMather on 0161 850 9911. We are here to help you navigate the complexities of the legal landscape and safeguard your business.
by Saqib Khan | Feb 13, 2024 | Business, General, Litigation, People
Introduction
In the dynamic landscape of business energy contracts, companies often find themselves grappling with unforeseen challenges, one of which is the presence of hidden commissions. These covert charges, lurking beneath the surface of seemingly transparent agreements, have become a significant concern for businesses seeking fair and cost-effective energy solutions. In this blog post, we shed light on the issue of hidden commission claims in business energy contracts within the UK, exploring the potential avenues for redress and the legal concepts of dilution and rescission.
Understanding Hidden Commissions
Hidden commissions are concealed charges that energy brokers or suppliers may include in business energy contracts, often without the knowledge or consent of the client. These undisclosed fees can significantly inflate the overall cost of energy services, impacting a company’s bottom line. Unscrupulous practices related to hidden commissions have prompted increased scrutiny, leading to a growing number of businesses exploring their options for reclaiming overpaid amounts.
Hidden Commission Claims
Businesses that suspect they may have fallen victim to hidden commissions have the right to pursue a claim against their energy supplier or broker. The first step in this process is often conducting a thorough review of the energy contracts in question. We can assist in identifying any hidden commissions and assessing their impact on the client’s financial obligations.
Dilution and Rescission:
Two legal concepts that may come into play when addressing hidden commission claims are dilution and rescission.
- Dilution: Dilution occurs when hidden commissions dilute the benefits intended for the client in the energy contract. In such cases, the client may not fully realize the expected cost savings or favourable terms initially negotiated. Legal remedies for dilution may involve seeking compensation for the diminished value of the contract or negotiating revised terms to restore the intended benefits.
- Rescission: Rescission is a more drastic measure, involving the cancellation of the contract altogether. If hidden commissions substantially impact the fairness and validity of the agreement, a business may pursue rescission to void the contract and seek restitution for any payments made. Rescission aims to place the parties in the position they would have been in had the contract never existed.
Conclusion
Businesses in the UK navigating the complex terrain of energy contracts must be vigilant against the presence of hidden commissions. Pursuing claims for redress, whether through dilution or rescission, is a legal avenue available to those seeking to rectify the financial harm caused by undisclosed charges. Consulting with one of our legal professionals specializing in energy law is crucial to understanding the intricacies of hidden commission claims and exploring the most effective paths to resolution. By unveiling the veil on hidden commissions, businesses can protect their interests and foster a fair and transparent energy marketplace.