In the wake of a loved one’s passing, emotions can run high, especially when it comes to the distribution of their estate. Unfortunately, disputes over wills are not uncommon, and they can lead to strained relationships and prolonged legal battles. If you find yourself in such a situation, you may be wondering whether it’s best to pursue litigation or mediation to resolve the dispute.

At Khan Mather, we understand the complexities and sensitivities involved in contested wills. Our goal is to provide clarity and guidance to our clients, helping them navigate the legal process with confidence and peace of mind. In this blog, we’ll explore the pros and cons of both litigation and mediation, helping you make an informed decision based on your unique circumstances.


Litigation involves taking the dispute to court, where a judge will ultimately make a decision on the matter. Here are some key points to consider:

  • Formal Process: Litigation follows a formal legal process, with each party presenting their case before a judge. This can be time-consuming and costly, as it often involves extensive preparation, court fees, and legal representation.


  • Adversarial Nature: Litigation is inherently adversarial, with each party working to prove their case and undermine the other’s arguments. This can lead to heightened tensions and further strain relationships between family members.


  • Binding Decision: Ultimately, the judge’s decision is binding, meaning both parties must abide by the court’s ruling. While this provides a sense of finality, it also means relinquishing control over the outcome to a third party.



Mediation, on the other hand, involves engaging a neutral third party to help facilitate discussions and reach a mutually acceptable resolution. Here’s what you need to know about this alternative approach:

  • Informal Process: Mediation offers a more informal and collaborative environment for resolving disputes. It allows both parties to express their concerns and interests openly, with the mediator guiding the conversation towards a resolution.


  • Preservation of Relationships: Unlike litigation, which can further strain relationships, mediation focuses on finding common ground and fostering understanding between parties. This can be particularly beneficial for preserving family relationships and minimizing conflict.


  • Control and Flexibility: In mediation, parties have more control over the outcome and can explore creative solutions that may not be available through litigation. This flexibility can lead to more tailored and satisfying resolutions for all involved.


Choosing the Right Path:

Ultimately, the decision to litigate or mediate will depend on your specific circumstances and priorities. While litigation may be necessary in cases of serious misconduct or irreconcilable differences, mediation offers a more collaborative and cost-effective alternative for many families.

At Khan Mather, we’re committed to helping our clients navigate contested wills with compassion and expertise. Whether you choose litigation or mediation, our experienced team is here to provide guidance every step of the way.

If you’re facing a disputed will and unsure of the best course of action, don’t hesitate to reach out to us for a confidential consultation. Together, we can explore your options and develop a strategy that aligns with your goals and values.

Remember, resolving a disputed will can be challenging, but with the right support and guidance, you can achieve a satisfactory outcome and move forward with peace of mind.