by Saqib Khan | Apr 18, 2024 | Litigation
Introduction
In this blog, we’ll provide an overview of the new FRC regime, how it may affect your legal matters, and how our law firm is prepared to help you navigate these changes.
What is the Fixed Recoverable Costs Regime?
The Fixed Recoverable Costs regime, also known as FRC, is a system that regulates the costs recoverable by the winning party in certain civil litigation cases. Its primary purpose is to promote transparency, predictability, and cost-effectiveness in the legal process, making litigation more accessible to all parties involved.
Key Changes Under the New FRC Regime
- Expanded Scope: One of the most notable changes is the expansion of the FRC regime to include a broader range of civil cases. While it was previously applicable to limited types of cases, it now covers a wider spectrum, including fast-track personal injury claims, clinical negligence claims, and more. This expansion may impact a broader range of clients, including businesses and individuals.
- Caps on Costs: The FRC regime sets out specific caps on the costs recoverable by the winning party, depending on the type and complexity of the case. These caps are intended to create predictability in litigation costs. However, it’s essential to carefully assess the potential recovery before pursuing a claim to ensure it aligns with your objectives.
- Cost Budgeting: Cost budgeting becomes even more critical under the new regime. Properly managing your legal costs and ensuring they align with your litigation strategy will be essential. Our firm has the expertise to help you create accurate and realistic cost budgets that comply with the FRC rules.
- Efficiency in Case Management: The FRC regime emphasizes the importance of efficient case management. Timely case preparation and streamlined processes will be key to controlling costs and maximizing recoverable expenses.
How We Can Help
Navigating the new Fixed Recoverable Costs regime may seem daunting, but our law firm is well-prepared to assist you. Here’s how we can help:
- Expertise and Guidance: Our experienced legal team is well-versed in the FRC regime and its implications. We can provide you with comprehensive advice on how the changes might affect your specific cases and strategies.
- Cost-Effective Strategies: We will work with you to develop cost-effective litigation strategies that align with the FRC regime, ensuring you make informed decisions about pursuing or defending claims.
- Accurate Budgeting: Our firm will assist you in creating precise cost budgets and ensuring compliance with the FRC rules, helping you manage your legal expenses effectively.
- Efficient Case Management: We prioritize efficient case management to ensure your matters proceed smoothly and within the FRC framework, maximizing your chances of cost recovery.
Conclusion
The new Fixed Recoverable Costs regime, effective from October 1, 2023, introduces significant changes to the legal landscape. Staying informed and adapting your litigation strategies accordingly is crucial. At [Your Law Firm], we are committed to helping you navigate these changes, mitigate risks, and achieve favourable outcomes within the FRC framework.
If you have any questions or concerns regarding how the new FRC regime may impact your legal matters, please don’t hesitate to reach out to us ON 0161 850 9911. We are here to provide the guidance and expertise you need to make informed decisions in this evolving legal landscape.
by Saqib Khan | Apr 17, 2024 | General, Litigation
Introduction
In the realm of legal disputes, Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) and civil litigation are two well-established pathways to justice. As a recognised law firm in the UK, we understand the complexities of these processes and are committed to helping our clients achieve favourable outcomes. In this blog post, we will delve into the world of ADR and civil litigation, shedding light on the key differences, advantages, and when to opt for each approach.
Understanding ADR
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) refers to methods of resolving legal disputes outside the courtroom. ADR techniques offer several advantages, making them a preferred choice for many clients and a valuable tool in our legal practice.
- Mediation: Mediation is a collaborative approach where a neutral third party, the mediator, facilitates communication between the parties. The aim is to reach a mutually satisfactory agreement. It often proves faster, more cost-effective, and less adversarial than litigation.
- Arbitration: In arbitration, parties present their case to an arbitrator, who makes a binding decision. This process offers flexibility, privacy, and expertise in the subject matter, making it a popular choice for resolving commercial disputes.
- Negotiation: Parties may engage in direct negotiations, settling their differences through discussion and compromise. This is the most informal ADR method, often employed before resorting to more structured ADR processes.
Understanding Civil Litigation
Civil litigation, on the other hand, involves disputes being resolved in a court of law. It is a formal and adversarial process that can be lengthy and costly. However, it remains essential for disputes where ADR is not feasible or has proven unsuccessful.
- Filing a Claim: Civil litigation starts with one party (the plaintiff) filing a claim against another party (the defendant) with a court. The defendant responds, and the litigation process begins.
- Discovery: This is a crucial phase in which both parties exchange information, evidence, and documents related to the case. It helps in building a robust case for trial.
- Trial: If a settlement cannot be reached during the pre-trial phase, the case goes to trial, where a judge or jury renders a verdict.
- **Appeal**: After the trial, either party may choose to appeal the decision if they believe there were errors in the legal process or the judgment itself.
When to Choose ADR or Civil Litigation
The decision to pursue ADR or civil litigation depends on the nature of the dispute and the specific needs and goals of the parties involved.
Choose ADR when:
- Privacy Matters: ADR proceedings are often confidential, preserving the reputation and trade secrets of the parties involved.
- Preserving Relationships: ADR methods promote cooperation and can be less adversarial, making them suitable for disputes involving ongoing relationships.
- Efficiency and Cost-Effectiveness: ADR processes are typically faster and more cost-effective than civil litigation, making them suitable for cases with limited time and resources.
Choose Civil Litigation when:
- Enforcing Legal Rights: When a party needs a court to enforce legal rights, such as obtaining an injunction, civil litigation is often the best route.
- Complex Legal Issues: In cases with complex legal matters or high stakes, litigation may provide a more comprehensive and structured resolution.
- Non-Cooperative Parties: When parties are unwilling to engage in good-faith negotiation or mediation, litigation may be the only viable option.
Conclusion
ADR and civil litigation are two valuable tools in the UK legal system for resolving disputes. As a reputable law firm, we understand the nuances of both approaches and work closely with our clients to determine the best strategy for their specific needs. Whether you choose ADR for its efficiency and cooperation or opt for civil litigation to enforce your legal rights, we are here to guide you through the process, ensuring that your interests are protected and justice is served.
Please call our civil litigation department on 0161 850 9911 to discuss any matters in this regard.
by Saqib Khan | Apr 1, 2024 | Conveyancing, General, Litigation
In recent years, the UK has witnessed a surge in the construction of new homes, promising modernity, comfort, and sustainability. However, amidst this housing boom, a concerning trend has emerged – the increasing prevalence of poor quality in new build properties. From structural defects to inadequate insulation, homeowners are facing a myriad of issues that undermine the very essence of homeownership – security and peace of mind.
At Khan Mather, we believe in advocating for the rights of homeowners and ensuring that they receive the quality they deserve. In this blog post, we delve into the root causes of the problem, its implications, and the legal avenues available to those affected.
Understanding the Causes
The reasons behind the decline in the quality of new build homes are multifaceted. One major factor is the pressure to meet high housing demand, leading to rushed construction schedules and cost-cutting measures by developers. Inadequate oversight and regulation exacerbate the problem, allowing substandard workmanship to go unchecked.
Moreover, the complexity of modern building techniques and materials has created challenges for both builders and inspectors, increasing the likelihood of errors slipping through the cracks.
Implications of Poor Quality New Build Homes for Homeowners
The consequences of purchasing a defective new build home can be devastating. Structural issues, dampness, and poor insulation not only compromise the safety and comfort of residents but also diminish the value of the property. In many cases, homeowners find themselves facing hefty repair bills, legal disputes with developers, and prolonged periods of uncertainty.
Beyond the financial implications, living in a defective property can take a toll on one’s physical and mental well-being, causing stress, frustration, and a sense of insecurity.
Legal Recourse
Fortunately, homeowners are not without recourse when faced with the ordeal of a poorly constructed home. Various legal avenues exist to hold developers accountable and seek redress for damages incurred.
One option is to pursue a claim under the Consumer Rights Act 2015, which provides protection for buyers against goods that are not of satisfactory quality or fit for purpose. Additionally, homeowners may have recourse through the NHBC Buildmark warranty or other structural insurance policies, which cover certain defects within a specified time frame.
Alternatively, if the defects are severe and widespread, homeowners may consider collective legal action, such as a group litigation order, to pool resources and strengthen their case against the developer.
Our Commitment
At Khan Mather, we are committed to standing by homeowners who have been affected by the scourge of poor quality new build homes. Our experienced team of solicitors specializes in construction law and will tirelessly advocate for your rights, guiding you through every step of the legal process with compassion and expertise.
If you find yourself grappling with the distressing reality of a defective new build property, don’t hesitate to reach out to us on 0161 850 9911. Together, we can work towards achieving the justice and resolution you deserve.
by Saqib Khan | Mar 26, 2024 | Conveyancing, Landlord and Tenant Law, Litigation
Introduction
Leasehold property ownership has long been a common way to own a home, especially in urban areas. However, many leaseholders face challenges and uncertainties when it comes to properties built using the Rapidly Applied Affordable Construction (RAAC) method. RAAC is a construction technique that was popular for its speed and cost-effectiveness but has since raised concerns due to issues related to building quality and safety. In this blog, we will discuss what leaseholders can do if their property was built using RAAC and what steps they can take to address potential issues.
Understanding RAAC Construction
RAAC construction is characterized by its rapid assembly of pre-fabricated components, often using lightweight materials. While this approach can deliver homes quickly and at a lower cost, it has also been associated with certain problems such as structural defects, inadequate insulation, and issues with fire safety.
Challenges for Leaseholders
Leaseholders of RAAC properties may face several challenges, including:
- Structural Concerns: RAAC properties may be more susceptible to structural issues, such as cracks in walls, due to the construction method. These issues can be costly to repair and may impact the property’s value.
- Fire Safety: Some RAAC properties have been found to have inadequate fire safety measures, which can pose significant risks to residents.
- Energy Efficiency: RAAC properties may not meet modern energy efficiency standards, resulting in higher energy bills for leaseholders.
- Warranty Issues: RAAC builders and developers may no longer be in business, making it difficult to claim on warranties for defects.
Steps for Leaseholders
If you are a leaseholder of an RAAC property, there are several steps you can take to address these challenges:
- Review Your Lease Agreement: Start by carefully reviewing your lease agreement to understand your rights and responsibilities as a leaseholder. Pay attention to any clauses related to maintenance and repairs.
- Join a Leaseholder Association: Consider joining or forming a leaseholder association with fellow residents. This can provide collective bargaining power and support in dealing with property-related issues.
- Seek Legal Advice: If you encounter structural defects, fire safety concerns, or other issues, consult one of our solicitors who specializes in property law. We can help you understand your legal options and potential claims against developers or builders.
- Engage with Local Authorities: Contact your local council and fire authority to report any concerns about fire safety or building quality. They may conduct inspections and take action if necessary.
- Energy Efficiency Improvements: Investigate energy-efficient upgrades that can improve the performance of your RAAC property. This may include better insulation, efficient heating systems, and double-glazed windows.
- Explore the Building Safety Act: Stay informed about developments in building safety legislation, such as the Building Safety Act. This legislation aims to improve building safety standards and may provide additional protections for leaseholders of RAAC properties.
- Consider Leasehold Reform: Keep an eye on proposed leasehold reform initiatives, which could change the legal framework for leasehold properties. These reforms may offer solutions for leaseholders facing RAAC-related challenges.
Conclusion
Leaseholders of RAAC properties face unique challenges related to building quality, safety, and energy efficiency. However, by understanding their rights, seeking legal advice, and engaging with local authorities and community organizations, leaseholders can take steps to address these issues. It is essential for leaseholders to stay informed about changes in legislation and actively advocate for their rights and the safety of their homes.
Please call us with any concerns you may have on 0161 850 9911.
by Saqib Khan | Mar 12, 2024 | General, Litigation, Personal injury
Introduction
In the ever-evolving world of corporate governance and financial reporting, the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) plays a pivotal role in ensuring transparency, accountability, and the integrity of financial information. The FRC sets standards and requirements that businesses in the UK must adhere to, but there are instances where exceptions can be made.
The Role of the FRC
The Financial Reporting Council, established in 1990, is the UK’s independent regulator responsible for promoting high-quality corporate governance and financial reporting. Its primary aim is to build trust in the corporate sector by upholding standards that ensure financial information is accurate, reliable, and useful to investors and the public.
Exceptions to FRC Requirements
While the FRC sets stringent requirements for financial reporting, there are circumstances where exceptions can be made. These exceptions typically fall into the following categories:
- Materiality: One of the fundamental principles in accounting and financial reporting is the concept of materiality. When a transaction, error, or omission is not considered material, it may not require strict adherence to FRC requirements. In such cases, businesses may exercise flexibility in presenting the information.
- Small Companies: The FRC recognizes that the financial reporting needs of smaller companies may differ significantly from those of large, complex entities. Small companies, as defined by the Companies Act 2006, may be exempt from certain FRC requirements, making the process more manageable for them.
- Micro-Entities: Micro-entities are a subset of small companies with specific criteria, such as low turnover and minimal assets. They are subject to reduced disclosure requirements, further reducing the regulatory burden.
- International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS): In some cases, companies can apply International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) instead of UK Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) when preparing their financial statements, subject to certain conditions. This allows for greater flexibility and alignment with international norms.
- Regulatory Changes and Adaptations: The FRC regularly reviews its standards to adapt to changing circumstances. During these reviews, it considers the impact on businesses and may provide transitional relief or exceptions to ease the transition into new regulations.
- Companies Act 2006 Exemptions: The Companies Act 2006 provides specific exemptions from certain FRC requirements for companies that meet the criteria. This includes exceptions related to the format of accounts, the audit requirement, and the need to file accounts with the Companies House.
Conclusion
While the Financial Reporting Council’s requirements are designed to maintain the highest standards of financial reporting and corporate governance in the UK, it is essential to recognize the need for exceptions. These exceptions ensure that businesses, especially smaller and less complex entities, can manage their financial reporting obligations effectively.
As a UK law firm, we understand the complexities of financial reporting and corporate governance. We work with our clients to ensure they meet their legal obligations while taking full advantage of any exceptions that apply to their unique circumstances. If you have questions or need guidance regarding FRC requirements and exceptions, do not hesitate to contact us on 0161 850 9911. We are here to help you navigate the intricate regulatory landscape and protect your interests.
by Saqib Khan | Mar 5, 2024 | Litigation, Powers of Attorney, Wills
In the wake of a loved one’s passing, emotions can run high, especially when it comes to the distribution of their estate. Unfortunately, disputes over wills are not uncommon, and they can lead to strained relationships and prolonged legal battles. If you find yourself in such a situation, you may be wondering whether it’s best to pursue litigation or mediation to resolve the dispute.
At Khan Mather, we understand the complexities and sensitivities involved in contested wills. Our goal is to provide clarity and guidance to our clients, helping them navigate the legal process with confidence and peace of mind. In this blog, we’ll explore the pros and cons of both litigation and mediation, helping you make an informed decision based on your unique circumstances.
Litigation:
Litigation involves taking the dispute to court, where a judge will ultimately make a decision on the matter. Here are some key points to consider:
- Formal Process: Litigation follows a formal legal process, with each party presenting their case before a judge. This can be time-consuming and costly, as it often involves extensive preparation, court fees, and legal representation.
- Adversarial Nature: Litigation is inherently adversarial, with each party working to prove their case and undermine the other’s arguments. This can lead to heightened tensions and further strain relationships between family members.
- Binding Decision: Ultimately, the judge’s decision is binding, meaning both parties must abide by the court’s ruling. While this provides a sense of finality, it also means relinquishing control over the outcome to a third party.
Mediation:
Mediation, on the other hand, involves engaging a neutral third party to help facilitate discussions and reach a mutually acceptable resolution. Here’s what you need to know about this alternative approach:
- Informal Process: Mediation offers a more informal and collaborative environment for resolving disputes. It allows both parties to express their concerns and interests openly, with the mediator guiding the conversation towards a resolution.
- Preservation of Relationships: Unlike litigation, which can further strain relationships, mediation focuses on finding common ground and fostering understanding between parties. This can be particularly beneficial for preserving family relationships and minimizing conflict.
- Control and Flexibility: In mediation, parties have more control over the outcome and can explore creative solutions that may not be available through litigation. This flexibility can lead to more tailored and satisfying resolutions for all involved.
Choosing the Right Path:
Ultimately, the decision to litigate or mediate will depend on your specific circumstances and priorities. While litigation may be necessary in cases of serious misconduct or irreconcilable differences, mediation offers a more collaborative and cost-effective alternative for many families.
At Khan Mather, we’re committed to helping our clients navigate contested wills with compassion and expertise. Whether you choose litigation or mediation, our experienced team is here to provide guidance every step of the way.
If you’re facing a disputed will and unsure of the best course of action, don’t hesitate to reach out to us for a confidential consultation. Together, we can explore your options and develop a strategy that aligns with your goals and values.
Remember, resolving a disputed will can be challenging, but with the right support and guidance, you can achieve a satisfactory outcome and move forward with peace of mind.
